Quite frankly your whole post indicates you're mind-fucked on a whole lot of topics. Deviating from your trained and ingrained framing from powerful institutions to include media gatekeepers, government gatekeepers, and institutional gatekeepers is a huge part of having a free mind. If you can't see the value in freeing yourself from those gatekeepers I don't think I or anyone can help you. If you think the "good guys" won WWII and the "bad guys" lost, I can't help you (leading to the rise of two of the worst and most genocidal governments in history the Soviet Union and Maoist China (https://grokipedia.com/page/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany)(https://grokipedia.com/page/Mao_Zedong). Many of the restrictions you deem to be solely against calling out genocide aren't nearly limited at that. Several of the people I follow are clearly shadow banned or severely limited in an inconspicuous way without substantive reason (to include Doug Tuman, Derrick Bronze, and others), in the meantime many people on social media call for the equivalent of white genocide (or at the very least ethnic cleansing) without consequences to include even something like shadow banning. When you say things like "dangerous medical advice" consider that saying young, healthy people shouldn't get the covid shot was considered dangerous medical advice and is now largely vindicated even by official literature. Not all speech is good speech, I'm happy to say that. I think socialism, communism, gender theory, and progressivism in general is cancerous to society, but I think that absent government intervention the truth of my positions will prevail. Do you have that level of confidence in your positions? The question isn't about "free speech", the question is "What right does the government have to impose a cost on my speech?".
Quite frankly your whole post indicates you're mind-fucked on a whole lot of topics. Deviating from your trained and ingrained framing from powerful institutions to include media gatekeepers, government gatekeepers, and institutional gatekeepers is a huge part of having a free mind. If you can't see the value in freeing yourself from those gatekeepers I don't think I or anyone can help you. If you think the "good guys" won WWII and the "bad guys" lost, I can't help you (leading to the rise of two of the worst and most genocidal governments in history the Soviet Union and Maoist China (https://grokipedia.com/page/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_Germany)(https://grokipedia.com/page/Mao_Zedong). Many of the restrictions you deem to be solely against calling out genocide aren't nearly limited at that. Several of the people I follow are clearly shadow banned or severely limited in an inconspicuous way without substantive reason (to include Doug Tuman, Derrick Bronze, and others), in the meantime many people on social media call for the equivalent of white genocide (or at the very least ethnic cleansing) without consequences to include even something like shadow banning. When you say things like "dangerous medical advice" consider that saying young, healthy people shouldn't get the covid shot was considered dangerous medical advice and is now largely vindicated even by official literature. Not all speech is good speech, I'm happy to say that. I think socialism, communism, gender theory, and progressivism in general is cancerous to society, but I think that absent government intervention the truth of my positions will prevail. Do you have that level of confidence in your positions? The question isn't about "free speech", the question is "What right does the government have to impose a cost on my speech?".