pull down to refresh

For saying whites warring whites is not in the interest of whites.

Now 100% I could change "white" to chinese, african, indian or whatever and that statement would be perfectly acceptable and I'd never get banned for it.

I fully don't expect to get banned on stasher for repeating that comment. That's why stasher is better. Also,,,

X is mind programming algos to get you thinking whatever the architects want you to think.
It's the modern version of the "tv programs" that fully programmed boomers into the completely inert NPCs we see waddling everywhere.

Nahhh you won't get banned bro!

We just shit talk you into oblivion if we didn't like what you had to say.

Just like the good ole days where your bros kept you in check.

reply

you can try but ive got ancient lore and shit talk bulletproofs toggled on

reply

Crazy times.
X is retarded.

reply

They desparately want WWIII and are censoring heavily around this.

Newspapers - Moscow refuses German plea to deescalate...

Well we tried everything, lets go thermonuclear

Whites may have many enemies but other whites aint it.

reply

It depends on what you mean by whites warring whites. If you mean whites warring whites that are subservient and subordinate to non-whites (especially a particular conniving subgroup) I would have to disagree. You have to take your own side to play the game and you have to be willing to play the game. Anyone who disrupts that should be disrupted. There are plenty of whites that would shoot their teammate before shooting the enemy team. Our enemies don't win by direct warfare with us, they win by turning us against ourselves. Paradoxically that means you have to eliminate your own. Notice your enemies constantly infight and purity test and enforce ideological conformity.

"If I had but one bullet and were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the traitor have it." -Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

reply

You're safe here.

reply