I think you missed something key within my response. I'm saying you have some people build out parallel systems, some people take more direct action. They're meant to complement each other. You have people actively interfering with state aims and operations at the same time as you build the alternative. That essentially creates the demand that is then captured by the movement. Person A interferes with the state mail system and then person B operates an alternative mail system. You don't need to have a majority, you just need a radical minority willing to actually take action. Some of this will happen naturally. It's basically like Konkin's strategy, but with actually interfering via direct action on purpose with state aims. Konkin is much more "Let the state degrade over time and then take over with parallel systems". I'm saying build parallel systems while striking back against those persons and organizations that cause the capture itself. The government lost its fear of the people because the people became spiritually captured with ideologies and theologies that are contrary to driving action towards a given goal when that goal is against an authority. The past couple millennia has led to a decline in the willingness to take action against the state. I'm trying to say we need to reverse that by correcting the limiting beliefs and shedding the theological and ideological constraints that are on us. Learned helplessness is a huge part of that. Don't need to take direct action or build parallel systems if I know I'm going to lose anyway (or I think it's theologically or ideologically immoral to take direct action), which makes me want to accept that I'll lose, which makes me lose. Responding to your broad enough point, you can just get people to target complementary, but different targets. You act as the elephant in the dark room people feel out and each think is a different thing. Also, you're not building or operating off of one system, you're building multiple. It's a chain link of concentric circles of organizations targeting complementary, but different goals. It's posting a bounty and letting 100 bounty hunters try to catch a target instead of paying one bounty hunter and hoping he succeeds.