pull down to refresh

Agreed. People talk like all the code written before AI was great, or like everyone was building valuable software. Most of it wasn’t. Anyone who has touched programming even a little knows syntax is torture, and even testing a tiny idea used to eat a lot of time and effort. Yet most people were googling their way through it anyway. People forget the “google how to center a div” jokes.

Who wrote the code doesn’t matter much. Software engineering is a measurable field, and a product has value for what it is, not for who made it. If you’re smart enough, lean toward engineering and know a bit about how software works, not using an LLM is a real waste of time.

You just have to know what you’re doing. That’s the real point, and it’s not that hard to learn. Most people who can’t build anything of real value, or who ship security problems, fail right here.

Even if the code came from divine revelation rather than an LLM; quality, security, performance, and a well-thought-out underlying architecture are what truly matter.

As Linus Torvalds said:
“Talk is cheap. Show me the code.”

We went from humans copying human code to machines copying human code. That's about it. 90% of coding would be eliminated if companies weren't fucking retarded IP (Intellectual Property not Internet Protocol) maxxers.

reply

Yes, that’s exactly how it was, lol. When I was just trying things out with HTML and CSS, I’d open sites with good design, hit inspect, copy the parts I liked, fix them up and paste them into my own file. I’d take the layout of the homepage cards from the New York Times and a navbar from some other site.

reply