pull down to refresh

You may be missing the premise of my point. My point is are all humans human in the comprehensive and complementary way that we use that term?

I'm also saying what if she is more human and they are more well written machines that trigger an emotional response in the player, but they genuinely are a machine imitating a human than a machine that genuinely has human characteristics? Would her actions then not be borne out of a desperation from a lack of genuine connection with a being of proximate sentience? And would they not be moral considering the others are just machines and not actually sentient?

That being said, the determinism part is also valid. Norse societies believed in "the fates" (Norns), but still believed there was wiggle room. Your death was guaranteed, but you still maintained agency throughout and how you addressed your death and end affected your afterlife and the fate of your descendants. Not dissimilar to an RPG where there is one set ending, but how you live and who you interact with changes things about the world that may be included in the end game wrap up with the implication that your end was always fixed, but how you get there contains many opportunities to exert agency. It's a complicated series of concepts though, so I may have gotten some of that wrong.