pull down to refresh
You're speaking in associations rather than abstractions and spectrums, which is a common misconception, and what i assumed I'd have to face, as always when i talk about these things. Frankly I really dont care about exceptions to the rules, as of course "exception to the rule merely prove the rule", and are otherwise irrelevant. Exceptions are the result of spectrums, and help us understand them, but do not disprove them in the slightest. So of course in a lower dimensional context, women will exhibit human traits rather than vessel traits in some outlying cases. Which is why I included Weininger's book at the end. I never claimed ALL, and spending all this energy to plead that "not all women" is such a midwit 105IQ response, very sad. Obviously i speak in generalizations. And yes Ayn Rand was an incredible woman that I deeply respect, her book Atlas Shrugged is genuinely the only path to saving this world.
btw AilliA is not a woman lmfao its a dude larping.
This post is largely abrahamic despite its appeals to non-abrahamic sources. In ancient (pre-christian) Norse societies women had a much greater role than just cattle to be conquered. They were the managers of the household while the men were gone on raids. They were able to get divorced simply by declaration. They were able to own land. The roles you ascribe to women are likely for an intersectionality of women that is largely of a foreign people (often semitic as is conducive to the religion of Christianity's roots). If you understand different peoples as capable of different intellectual capacities then it becomes clear that within indo-european women it is indeed possible for them to reach the status of humanity that you define. They can be thinking beings of a high enough sentience to warrant respect. That being said, this is not the default. We have long filtered for, and brainwashed for intellectual garbage and a near complete lack of standards amongst this sex. That must be remediated. The majority of women of all sorts, likely meet your distinctions, but I would argue the stashettes here of the two who have revealed themselves and I have interacted with (@artemis and @AilliA), are capable enough to warrant further consideration. I agree with your general sentiment, but to the extent that it results in the wholly indiscriminate dismissal of ALL of the members of that sex, I think it is slightly overly-broad.
I think in order to properly assess the status of humanity of women in a comparative sense, you must also examine the status of humanity of men of other races and intellectual capabilities.
If you want to get real particular about it, it's like the grip strength test.
Overall, I'm in near complete agreement with you, but I wouldn't want this type of exploration to result in the elimination of an Ayn Rand type woman, who was undoubtedly influential in a positive sense, broadly.