@ProfAnarch people should look at where the "Jew" comes from first. As with any other religion, the term and the books, contrary to what most of us believe, are used as instruments. I'd avoid falling into the divide-and-conquer ideology. The ones we should be worried about we most probably can't see.
What Heys is talking about are most relevantly defined as frankists, a cult more than a religion? Not even sure it has survived long enough to become socially acceptable as religion. Perhaps not yet?
What I liked about Heys's series is how simply he connected the dots to tell the overall story. All references with books and quotes are worth reading and reading again.
@OldNorseAnarchist I'd not like my silence to be interpreted as avoiding. I'm reading you, and why I do not interact is because your perspective on topics familiar to me is new, so I have no background to comment on it. But I'll soon, as I learn more about the specifics, share my questions and interact a bit more :)
@ProfAnarch people should look at where the "Jew" comes from first. As with any other religion, the term and the books, contrary to what most of us believe, are used as instruments. I'd avoid falling into the divide-and-conquer ideology. The ones we should be worried about we most probably can't see.
What Heys is talking about are most relevantly defined as frankists, a cult more than a religion? Not even sure it has survived long enough to become socially acceptable as religion. Perhaps not yet?
What I liked about Heys's series is how simply he connected the dots to tell the overall story. All references with books and quotes are worth reading and reading again.
@OldNorseAnarchist I'd not like my silence to be interpreted as avoiding. I'm reading you, and why I do not interact is because your perspective on topics familiar to me is new, so I have no background to comment on it. But I'll soon, as I learn more about the specifics, share my questions and interact a bit more :)