Yet you believe in the myth of evolution. This is the same superstition, the belief that things naturally progress in and of themselves.

Can you define what you mean here? Even most Christians believe in at least natural selection/artificial selection and microevolution. Do you not believe in macroevolution only or the whole thing?

Most Western pagans were so savage they did not have written records and much of what we know of them is through Christian monks...

So am I incorrect to state that you believe most European pagans were listless savages until the Jews and/or Jesus came along to civilize them? Also, Christians destroyed a lot of things when they came along. It's entirely possible that included additional written records. Runes existed before Christians arrived, the majority of pagan society wasn't literate as far as we know as was overwhelmingly the case across most of the world even in the literate parts at the time. These illiterate people also built advanced ships, established expansive trade routes, and were near unparalleled in battle. They also built complex structures. Their legal structure was also fairly advanced and well balanced and allowed for a lot of freedom to the point that we would possibly be envious of even to this day.

You are correct however in stating that pagan thought has had influence in the west, but mostly negatively. The merging of paganism with Christianity was necessary to keep it alive through the emergence of Constantine’s Holy Roman Catholic Church, which the British Reformed and then created the world’s greatest super power.

I would argue they had to make Christianity more pagan and lie about a lot of its characteristics in order to make it appealing to the pagans and other people who they converted. This is what syncretism was. It was lying about tolerating things that were heretical as a means of slippery sloping them into Christianity. I would argue there were a lot of positive things that fell along the wayside from the elimination of pagan ideals and beliefs.

Is creating a world hegemonic government something I'm supposed to praise? I would argue most more distributed systems were more free than the concentrated hegemony we have today, which is generally in line with what Hoppe found.

Paganism is not a suppressed religion that needs to be returned to. It is in fact the philosophical basis of the whole enlightenment and technocratic tyrannical world order.

Why? Do you even know enough about paganism to say such a thing? What about it is so bad? Be specific and stick to ancestrally European paganism since that's the scope of the discussion.

Charles Darwin did not invent the ideas behind evolution, he plagiarised and popularised the work of his grandfather Erasmus Darwin who wrote Zoonomia. Erasmus was also the grandmaster of the local masonic lodge.

Satan himself says 2+2=4. Does that make it 5?

Pagan ideas were harboured underground in masonic institutions and popularised once they achieved ascendency through their many revolutions.

What ideas and why were they bad?

It is these groups with their pagan doctrines that now control the world by achieving their goals which was the eradication of Christian government, the family and the influence of the church in society and to bring about a new secular global order.

Why was Christianity vulnerable to such subversion? Were there epistemological weaknesses to exploit that are fundamental to the faith?

While Christianity is openly ridiculed and mocked, such as the Sam Smith 2023 Grammy Awards ceremony and the Paris Olympics ceremony already linked:

Christianity mocks itself everyday. It hardly needs the help. Didn't the pope declare support for the migrant invasion? Didn't Erika Kirk publicly forgive her husband's killer? Didn't Austin Metcalf's father do the same? Don't many preachers say we have to support the state of Israel because the bible says so? That being said, I obviously disagree with the Olympics thing. Honestly though, oftentimes I think the things that get mocked most about Christianity is the tendency to call everything "demonic", the self-flagellation over sin, and the over indexing on forgiveness (without contrition oftentimes). I think those things warrant criticism and some Christians themselves criticize these things. I also think a lot of criticizing Christianity is just a backdoor way of insulting white people.

People who believe they are simply animals fall into nihilism and pleasure seeking – the exact psychological condition needed to create compliant global slaves.

I don't advocate hedonism. Obviously I have my own beliefs and belief structure which I find to be life affirming and positive, but I'm not going to lay it out here. That's besides the point. For the sake of this discussion we'll leave it at: I don't endorse hedonism and I recognize the importance of spirituality in human direction and fulfilment.

This is all I have to say on this subject and I have no desire to discuss epistemology let alone theology until you can at least acknowledge the simple fact that evolution is a progressive myth rooted in paganism and embraced by technocracy.

I already asked earlier for you to be more specific about what you mean by evolution. Can you point me to the arguments and sources that you find compelling against evolution? I'm open to looking into it and potentially challenging my beliefs if the critiques are well founded.