If you reject second wave feminism, but not first wave, you're just making a middling unimpactful critique. The reason I reject abrahamaism, universalism, and progressivism is that those things logically produce gay race communism as a coherent logical progression. Your points on testosterone and the environmental factors are well taken. I would also say that because of the nature of democracy, weak men compound as their decisions create weak male decisions that create more weak men.
All that being said: I think much of this is actually a rejection from a genetic/ancestral memory temperament perspective from women to a certain degree. Women did have two advisory roles in Norse societies: Seeress and priestess. Women could also testify in court and declare divorce at any time without church (or higher legal) consent. Women in many ways had substantially more rights compared to the later more restrictive rights of women in Christian society. Women didn't have "voting power" in þing, but their opinions were valued if they proved valuable and their consent was considered often and their autonomy was preserved to a certain extent. I think different societies treated women differently and those different systems arguably were best fit to those societies. This is especially relevant when you consider the differences in intellectual capacity for the intersectionality of race plus sex. If different intellectual capacities are considered it would make more sense for Norse women as opposed to Arabic women.
Additionally, women were both forcibly prohibited from and forcibly introduced into the workforce by the state. Most women fill garbage state based jobs and companies are forced to hire women when they otherwise wouldn't. In my experience 80% of women are incompetent in their roles compared to men. That doesn't mean the 20% should be excluded by law, it just means that the 80% is there only because of government force. The overwhelming majority of women should be at home raising families. That's not even considering how putting women's interests against men and factoring in a state looting component makes women and men natural enemies instead of allies.
If you reject second wave feminism, but not first wave, you're just making a middling unimpactful critique. The reason I reject abrahamaism, universalism, and progressivism is that those things logically produce gay race communism as a coherent logical progression. Your points on testosterone and the environmental factors are well taken. I would also say that because of the nature of democracy, weak men compound as their decisions create weak male decisions that create more weak men.
All that being said: I think much of this is actually a rejection from a genetic/ancestral memory temperament perspective from women to a certain degree. Women did have two advisory roles in Norse societies: Seeress and priestess. Women could also testify in court and declare divorce at any time without church (or higher legal) consent. Women in many ways had substantially more rights compared to the later more restrictive rights of women in Christian society. Women didn't have "voting power" in þing, but their opinions were valued if they proved valuable and their consent was considered often and their autonomy was preserved to a certain extent. I think different societies treated women differently and those different systems arguably were best fit to those societies. This is especially relevant when you consider the differences in intellectual capacity for the intersectionality of race plus sex. If different intellectual capacities are considered it would make more sense for Norse women as opposed to Arabic women.
Additionally, women were both forcibly prohibited from and forcibly introduced into the workforce by the state. Most women fill garbage state based jobs and companies are forced to hire women when they otherwise wouldn't. In my experience 80% of women are incompetent in their roles compared to men. That doesn't mean the 20% should be excluded by law, it just means that the 80% is there only because of government force. The overwhelming majority of women should be at home raising families. That's not even considering how putting women's interests against men and factoring in a state looting component makes women and men natural enemies instead of allies.
Related discussion
https://rumble.com/v7h3o3s-slotkins-threat-work-for-trump-and-well-come-for-you..html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
~1:38
@artemis I think this would interest you. You seem rationally sane.