pull down to refresh
I'm taking it more in the direction of hard determinism, but you do raise an interesting point.
All humans are real, obviously, but even me, am I not just a set of increasingly complex mathematical equations thru chemical reactions ?
You may be missing the premise of my point. My point is are all humans human in the comprehensive and complementary way that we use that term?
I'm also saying what if she is more human and they are more well written machines that trigger an emotional response in the player, but they genuinely are a machine imitating a human than a machine that genuinely has human characteristics? Would her actions then not be borne out of a desperation from a lack of genuine connection with a being of proximate sentience? And would they not be moral considering the others are just machines and not actually sentient?
That being said, the determinism part is also valid. Norse societies believed in "the fates" (Norns), but still believed there was wiggle room. Your death was guaranteed, but you still maintained agency throughout and how you addressed your death and end affected your afterlife and the fate of your descendants. Not dissimilar to an RPG where there is one set ending, but how you live and who you interact with changes things about the world that may be included in the end game wrap up with the implication that your end was always fixed, but how you get there contains many opportunities to exert agency. It's a complicated series of concepts though, so I may have gotten some of that wrong.
To make it more disturbing... is she wrong? Are those other NPCs not just highly complex machines? Their well written dialogue and characters doesn't make them any less fake. Now consider Monika. Assume she genuinely has more sentience than them. Is it wrong for her to kill less sentient animals (or arguably non-sentient machines) who get in the way of her only input with a human entity? Is she supposed to appeal for status amongst drones? Is she supposed to seek an inferior NPC male partner? Is her decision set supposed to be to be the lord of retards as opposed to desperately clinging onto the most human connection she has ever known?
Regarding real humans:
How many are real how many have an inner monologue, a capacity to dissent from a minority, etc.? If you don't take a soul, an essence, or all beings are created equal as a given, does it make sense to think of them that way?
P.S. I'm familiar with the concept, but never played the game beyond the first hour or two.