Fair enough. I plan on writing more on it in the future with references and more fleshed out arguments. I can also provide sources regarding the historicity of Jesus and Jesus mythicism. You may not like my arguments, but I believe them to be well thought out and well founded. I welcome dissenting arguments if they are of high quality and addressing my actual points instead of appealing to consensus, the status quo, or institutional bias. You want to trade insults, I'll do that all fucking day. You want to debate points in a civil fashion, I'll do that too. Attacking pagan conservatives is not productive. What have christian conservatives conserved over the past 100 years? Not a damned thing. So don't suppress newcomers within your own people that propose something different just because they want to return to an earlier ancestral European religion. Nobody is proposing American Hinduism. I would put on the templar outfit with you if someone proposed that. I think tolerance for religion should be scoped to ancestral European religions (Christianity/European paganism), not judaism/Islam/Hinduism. E-crusaders come from just as much of a minority viewpoint as conservative pagans whether you like it or not. Approaching the argument from a viewpoint of haughty derision is not productive.
I would also ask that you provide a source for your passage above. Christian antisemitism is fighting with one hand behind your back because you accept many tenants and key components of their religion implicitly and explicitly. Much of the logic behind not blaming the jews for shit they very much did is because of arguments like this. I don't think they're 100% behind everything, but they are a powerful faction and most sects of Christianity fight against them with unwarranted restraint because of their theology. They are the most powerful faction in the world. It is comprised of a race, religion, culture, and nation. Disallowing an honest examination of their organization and works because of theological blinders is not productive.
Also, the image was a nice touch. I chuckled at that one.
Fair enough. I plan on writing more on it in the future with references and more fleshed out arguments. I can also provide sources regarding the historicity of Jesus and Jesus mythicism. You may not like my arguments, but I believe them to be well thought out and well founded. I welcome dissenting arguments if they are of high quality and addressing my actual points instead of appealing to consensus, the status quo, or institutional bias. You want to trade insults, I'll do that all fucking day. You want to debate points in a civil fashion, I'll do that too. Attacking pagan conservatives is not productive. What have christian conservatives conserved over the past 100 years? Not a damned thing. So don't suppress newcomers within your own people that propose something different just because they want to return to an earlier ancestral European religion. Nobody is proposing American Hinduism. I would put on the templar outfit with you if someone proposed that. I think tolerance for religion should be scoped to ancestral European religions (Christianity/European paganism), not judaism/Islam/Hinduism. E-crusaders come from just as much of a minority viewpoint as conservative pagans whether you like it or not. Approaching the argument from a viewpoint of haughty derision is not productive.
I would also ask that you provide a source for your passage above. Christian antisemitism is fighting with one hand behind your back because you accept many tenants and key components of their religion implicitly and explicitly. Much of the logic behind not blaming the jews for shit they very much did is because of arguments like this. I don't think they're 100% behind everything, but they are a powerful faction and most sects of Christianity fight against them with unwarranted restraint because of their theology. They are the most powerful faction in the world. It is comprised of a race, religion, culture, and nation. Disallowing an honest examination of their organization and works because of theological blinders is not productive.
Also, the image was a nice touch. I chuckled at that one.