pull down to refresh

0 mXMR \ 1 reply \ @monero 23 Oct freebie \ parent \ on: [Documentary] REPLACING EUROPE: Following the World's Deadliest Migration Route Library

Not worth my time answering walls of text with internet strangers on basket-weaving forums. I'll leave you with this excerpt which might be relevant:

Judaism, as it was originally understood, no longer exists today. The contemporary religion that identifies itself as "Judaism" is more accurately referred to as Talmudism. Today’s self-proclaimed Jews are primarily comprised of Eurasian Talmudists who lack significant Hebrew ancestry and show little continuity with the beliefs of the Old Testament. They do not await the Messiah, having rejected Him upon His arrival. Additionally, there is no temple, priesthood, or sacrificial system in place; the destruction of Solomon’s Temple marked the end of the Levitical line of priests.
In response to the rise of Christianity, the rabbis compiled the Talmud between the 3rd and 6th centuries. This extensive work, which is 2.5 times larger than the Bible, is a commentary on the supposed Oral Torah that was allegedly passed down from Moses. However, the Old Testament itself grants no authority to rabbinical leadership; it recognizes a priesthood, not rabbis. Since the rabbis are unordained and lack priestly lineage, their legitimacy is derived solely from Talmudic precepts. Without these, there would be no "Rabbinic Judaism."
In addition to the Talmud, Talmudists use a modified version of the Old Testament known as the Masoretic Text. This text was altered by a group of scholars called the Masoretes between the 7th and 10th centuries, primarily to obscure prophecies concerning Christ. Many Talmudists also incorporate the Kabbalah—a 13th-century esoteric interpretation of the Torah—into their beliefs. The end result is a religious system that is fundamentally different from the original Jewish faith. In this sense, Talmudism is to Judaism what Mormonism is to Christianity.

Happy Thursday.

https://stasher.news/uploads/926

write
compose
0 mXMR \ 0 replies \ @OldNorseAnarchistflame 23 Oct

Fair enough. I plan on writing more on it in the future with references and more fleshed out arguments. I can also provide sources regarding the historicity of Jesus and Jesus mythicism. You may not like my arguments, but I believe them to be well thought out and well founded. I welcome dissenting arguments if they are of high quality and addressing my actual points instead of appealing to consensus, the status quo, or institutional bias. You want to trade insults, I'll do that all fucking day. You want to debate points in a civil fashion, I'll do that too. Attacking pagan conservatives is not productive. What have christian conservatives conserved over the past 100 years? Not a damned thing. So don't suppress newcomers within your own people that propose something different just because they want to return to an earlier ancestral European religion. Nobody is proposing American Hinduism. I would put on the templar outfit with you if someone proposed that. I think tolerance for religion should be scoped to ancestral European religions (Christianity/European paganism), not judaism/Islam/Hinduism. E-crusaders come from just as much of a minority viewpoint as conservative pagans whether you like it or not. Approaching the argument from a viewpoint of haughty derision is not productive.

I would also ask that you provide a source for your passage above. Christian antisemitism is fighting with one hand behind your back because you accept many tenants and key components of their religion implicitly and explicitly. Much of the logic behind not blaming the jews for shit they very much did is because of arguments like this. I don't think they're 100% behind everything, but they are a powerful faction and most sects of Christianity fight against them with unwarranted restraint because of their theology. They are the most powerful faction in the world. It is comprised of a race, religion, culture, and nation. Disallowing an honest examination of their organization and works because of theological blinders is not productive.

Also, the image was a nice touch. I chuckled at that one.

reply