pull down to refresh
Probably not. That being said, not everything, everywhere, all the time has to be them or be about them. If you think I'm engaging in apologetics, search Jew in my history.
Thank you for the recommendation @artemis. I've generally found you to be acting in good faith with relative openness and curiosity so I will check it out. Bookmarked. I'll let you know what I think. I didn't see you in my havamal posts or Introduction to Old Norse Anarchism. Are you still interested or should I stop tagging you? I wouldn't be insulted, I know I'm quite taboo and controversial.
@ProfAnarch people should look at where the "Jew" comes from first. As with any other religion, the term and the books, contrary to what most of us believe, are used as instruments. I'd avoid falling into the divide-and-conquer ideology. The ones we should be worried about we most probably can't see.
What Heys is talking about are most relevantly defined as frankists, a cult more than a religion? Not even sure it has survived long enough to become socially acceptable as religion. Perhaps not yet?
What I liked about Heys's series is how simply he connected the dots to tell the overall story. All references with books and quotes are worth reading and reading again.
@OldNorseAnarchist I'd not like my silence to be interpreted as avoiding. I'm reading you, and why I do not interact is because your perspective on topics familiar to me is new, so I have no background to comment on it. But I'll soon, as I learn more about the specifics, share my questions and interact a bit more :)
Well, will he name the jew or not? That is the most important issue. Anything else is just a diversion and rambling, and it’s a waste of time.