pull down to refresh

WOW

Is that because of the MWEB history you think? Did they not give a specific reason, just "invalid"?

This might be the first report of a Litecoin MWEB transaction being discriminated against for its use of optional privacy.

I know that they cited "compliance" as a reason why they said my transaction was invalid - as shown in the image. They may or may not have said "suspicious" - I honestly don't remember. I can still see the transaction on their payment gateway in my head, but I'm unsure of the exact wording that was used.

Can't go without verifying the identity of a suspicious $7 transaction. lol

reply