![](https://stasher.news/uploads/781)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p31ksQRzCSE

"Fuck you Clanker! I said it and I meant it!" 

P.S. Surprisingly hard to find photos of destroying robot armies nowadays. Thought it would have been a simple search.

> it's "Clankers".

No, no, no. Sir AI Agent, please forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.
![](https://stasher.news/uploads/778)

AilliA

I think over time as it's made clear that some people are engagement farming for profit, eventually people will just down vote it.

I'm surprised I didn't notice the AI content before. I guess I'm not that used to looking for it in writing. I don't follow people that write using AI to my knowledge because I generally don't find people who write interesting things to be writing them using AI. I've seen a couple that can, but I'm thinking of two examples and I don't even read them often. There's still something fundamentally human about good writing that I don't think will change. In the near future at least.

Also, the proper term for them isn't AI agents, it's "Clankers".

AskSN

Are AI agents among us?

quadriocellata

I think over time as it's made clear that some people are engagement farming for profit, eventually people will just down vote it. 

I'm surprised I didn't notice the AI content before. I guess I'm not that used to looking for it in writing. I don't follow people that write using AI to my knowledge because I generally don't find people who write interesting things to be writing them using AI. I've seen a couple that can, but I'm thinking of two examples and I don't even read them often. There's still something fundamentally human about good writing that I don't think will change. In the near future at least.

Also, the proper term for them isn't AI agents, it's "Clankers".