I heard a rumor California counties actually monitor Google earth/sat view sites to see if people add unpermitted additions to their backyard (they probably rely on snitching primarily). Quite a dystopia.

It also feels like people are more willing to engage in discussing opposing viewpoints here. And in good faith too. I greatly appreciate it.

I sit corrected, also looks like I wasn't the only one to colaborate!

Honestly reddit (and many other socials) mostly sucks because of bots and mods. So far this site has neither. The sync thing is convenient too.

Someone get that pussycat to stop horsin' around!

Wrong he tipped 68.6. I tipped 1 first. 😎
Team effort. I'm the first one to collaborate with the anon to our knowledge.

Retards live happy lives. It's all those thinkin men who sit all day being sad

Beautiful.

this is only partially correct because it does hurt privacy. the protocol works because all txns look nearly identical; a bunch of txns with bloated tx_extra fields do not look like the other txns. this makes it notably easier for firms like Chainalysis to perform passive blockchain analysis.

there's also the bloating due to spam, as you said.

Making the chain unusable is also harmful to privacy. Ultimately the Monero project, devs, and community are committed to the mission of private digital cash. If this gets in the way, it will be addressed. That being said, I think Monero is more insulated from this because we are less dogmatic about block size. Dynamic blocks arguably insulate Monero from this effect to a certain degree. If changes are needed they will be made. There are dogmas and taboos in Monero, but those are Proof of Work, the tail emission size, and privacy. I think those are generally well founded although personally I'm not as dogmatic about the tail emission size and I remain open, but not convinced of alternatives to Proof of Work.

He only likes it if you do

su -

first

Can these people just stop being insufferable and go do this shit on one of the billion other blockchains that work better for this kind of shit? Hell, fork Monero and make fucking Memenero where there's a meme in every block. If NFTs and other stenography on Monero negatively affect the privacy, I'm always against it. If they can do it without hurting Monero's privacy, that's fine I don't care. I wonder how FCMP would affect this.

Instead, I'd say that there is no right to freedom in any domain for any man unless he can defend it. There are no rights but those you take. If rights are granted, they aren't rights, they are just permission. Historically, there have been men who, through bonding together with other disciplined and capable men, have had sufficient strength to take their own freedom and defend it from aggressors. These I labeled "nobles". Everyone else can be enslaved, not because morality says so, but because they can't stop it from happening if/when aggressors come to enslave.

Yeah, I agree. My criticism is the sentiment or connotations that your message in the sign conveys. "Everybody is eligible for slavery except nobles, determined by nobles" does not remotely sound like what you and I have discussed previously. An observer without context would likely be off put even if he would agree with your messaging if given a chance for further discussion. If we want to recruit action takers to our side we have to have quality messaging that doesn't stop them before they start investigating.

I would add that, generally, these nobles would establish some hierarchical order that benefits themselves by also enabling lower classes some freedom from the "war of all against all" and thereby winning their allegiance and support. This order is the foundation of western civ.

Agreed. Any system of hierarchy has to establish a two way benefit for it to be a sustainable system in the long run.

So they were subject to slavery then.

Not at the "command of a noble". This is intentional misunderstanding. Rare conditional enslavement is not the same as at the discretion of the class of nobles. Under your standard of taking an extremely rare scenario and using it to form a generalization, nobles are also subject to enslavement. It also misunderstands the power balance of ancient societies to say that everyone was ruled by a benevolent class of nobles that had absolute power. This wasn't the case. Nobles could and would be checked by freemen if they didn't follow the established customs of rule or were too harmful to their people. Similar to the way nobles would rebel against and overthrow kings. Pre-christian and pre-democratic societies weren't more free compared to modern societies because they had benevolent rulers with unlimited power, they were more free because there were checks against each institution of power which was far more distributed than the systems we have today.

Well, black is dark. I also didn't notice and correct it.

Stop telling the normies about how turfs work. Better for them to get baited into paying their ideological opposition because of their lack of intelligence. Hahaha

While Mav may or may not be a fed or a scammer, you're a real worthless piece of shit for recommending snitching to the FBI. You're already worse than a fed. You're a fucking snitch (which is basically a fed considering how they use CIs).

Probably not. That being said, not everything, everywhere, all the time has to be them or be about them. If you think I'm engaging in apologetics, search Jew in my history.

Thank you for the recommendation @artemis. I've generally found you to be acting in good faith with relative openness and curiosity so I will check it out. Bookmarked. I'll let you know what I think. I didn't see you in my havamal posts or Introduction to Old Norse Anarchism. Are you still interested or should I stop tagging you? I wouldn't be insulted, I know I'm quite taboo and controversial.

yes
because all the nonsense that yall posted dont belong in a mmorpg game chat
now we can go back to gaming

This is clearly addressing gaming culture, which is relevant to gaming.

You address nothing and call it nonsense. Great.

not a dude, but indeed gay af, been in a lesbian relationship for the past 8 years, so to anyone that knew us back then, we still together and doing great <3

I should have known. It's a typical woman behavior to just call men gay when they call out valid issues with things they agree with. Keep gobbling down the status quo. Gay, woman, opinionated, retarded. Many such cases.

Feminization weakens any kind of desire for violent action.

Very true. Anti-vitalist stuff does too.

Anything that isn't white and male is good for them, because every other class besides white men, including indians and women, are completely and totally subservient to their whims and orders, and succumb to peer pressure instantly.

I agree with this generalization broadly. I think it's well supported by evidence.

Anyone who doesnt vehemently support violent action against the Satanic "elite" is a cattle and a part of the problem.

Honestly I don't think calling these people satanic does anyone any favors. They definitely deserve severe repudiation and are sick evil fucks, but I don't think making it seem like a Christian holy war is very productive. It's like when Christians say "Jews are bad because they killed Jesus". It just doesn't appeal to most people who otherwise might be persuaded when you point to the real actions they've taken to harm people. It's similar to when the Epstein files were released and Jones and others started going off saying they worship Baal. Proof? They have a bank statement that says Baal that's clearly a transcription error in context. Or the " jerky is children" thing. I don't think that's what they're talking about. I think they're talking about craft beef jerky which many prefer fresh and it has less preservatives so you have to refrigerate it. Getting way out over your skis on this kind of stuff just discredits dissidents and discourages participation from everyone that isn't a christian holy warrior type. I wouldn't take it seriously if I wasn't Christian and saw that for the first time. It's like when Christians sperg out over heavy metal or Monster energy cans. It just makes you look crazy and it disrupts recruitment of action takers to the cause.

finally we got segregation and the americans are now left to their american echo chamber of political nonsense rambling all day everyday
and eu (which includes middle east, russia and whatnot) just had the most wholesome day today for finally not having to read those americans ever again

Yeah, you're right. Europe is immune from these problems. Remember that report of mass rapes in the UK by the imported Muslim population? Remember that guy who got stabbed in the UK and the cops arrested him instead of administering aid when he said he had been stabbed and said "I don't think you have mate"? Remember when Germany elected Afd for a bunch of positions because they are so pissed off about immigration or how Ireland is pissed off about immigration and started rioting over it? What about the French "student protests"? These issues are "exclusively American" though.

@Mongoose i really tried to read your thread, but all i got from it is that you're like in love with masculinity or somethin so like, maybe u just gay u know? like, you're really really in love with it and dont want nothing feminine in the videogames, only for the dudes by the dudes, dude on dude gay sexo, like, if you read your own thread that's petty much it tbh

just sayin, that entire thread was a whole other level of cringe

How dare gamers not want garbage quality content coupled with unwanted progressive ideology shoved into their game?! They should stop being bigots! Why should the consumer be mad when we clearly don't give a fuck about appealing to our own largest sales demographic?!

You're gay as fuck dude. Why don't you go suck a tranny's dick? It's clear where you stand.

and before spewing bullshit like this:
"This means woman are artificially boosted to the best paid positions"
look within the monero ecosystem first and how bullshit and out of touch you are with actual reality

"You see here are 10 examples of women who are capable, clearly this means women aren't ever put in positions for political reasons."

Are you fucking serious dude? Do you even look into anything that you believe in from a contrarian standpoint? Do you even challenge your own views? Nope. Why don't you go consume some more goyslop media so you can find out what your next opinion will be?

P.S. Don't forget. There are mute buttons on here too. Have fun in your echo chamber.